Investigation of in vitro antimicrobial activities of some hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids commonly found in medicinal and aromatic plants

Abstract

Since hospital-acquired microorganisms are developing more and more resistance to antibiotics used today, researchers are turning to new searches in the treatment of infectious diseases. Unfortunately, unconscious use of antibiotics is another important reason why microorganisms develop resistance to infectious diseases. The aim of this study was to test the antimicrobial activity of some hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids on various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and a yeast strain (C. albicans). Agar well diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests were applied to determine the antimicrobial activities of phenolic acids. Considering the activity findings of phytochemicals on all test microorganisms, they were ranked in terms of their activities with a statistical method called the relative inhibitory capacity index (RICI) (a method that was first introduced in the literature by the current study). RICI analysis showed that the most effective phenolic acids for all test microorganisms were sinapic acid and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid. The RICI coefficients of these compounds were 1.02 and 0.99, respectively. Sinapic acid exhibited a zone of inhibition of 9.00-27.00 mm and an MIC of 18.00-72.00 mg/ml on microorganisms. Inhibition zone and MIC value ranges of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid were determined as 9.00-16.00 mm and 36.00-72.00 mg/ml, respectively. RICI analyzes confirmed that 2-phenylbutyric acid and phloroglucinol carboxylic acid did not show any antimicrobial activity. It is thought that sinapic acid and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid can be used as alternative antimicrobial agents against multi drug resistant microorganisms.

Keywords

References

1. Borges, A., Ferreira, C., Saavedra, M.J., Simões, M., 2013. Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microbial Drug Resistance, 19, 256-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2012.0244
2. Chatterjee, N.S., Panda, S.K., Navitha, M., Asha, K., Anandan, R., Mathew, S., 2015. Vanillic acid and coumaric acid grafted chitosan derivatives: improved grafting ratio and potential application in functional food. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52, 7153-7162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1874-4
3. Cho, J.-Y., Moon, J.-H., Seong, K.-Y., Park, K.-H., 1998. Antimicrobial activity of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and trans 4-hydroxycinnamic acid isolated and identified from rice hull. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 62, 2273-2276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.62.2273
4. Dietrich, H., Nikfardjam, M.S.P., 2017. Influence of phenolic compounds and tannins on wine-related microorganisms. Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine. Springer, pp. 421-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60021-5_18
5. Efem, S., 1988. Clinical observations on the wound healing properties of honey. British Journal of Surgery, 75, 679-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800750718
6. Engels, C., Schieber, A., Gänzle, M.G., 2012. Sinapic acid derivatives in defatted Oriental mustard (Brassica juncea L.) seed meal extracts using UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS and identification of compounds with antibacterial activity. European Food Research and Technology, 234, 535-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-012-1669-z
7. Istifli, E.S., Sihoglu Tepe, A., Sarikurkcu, C., Tepe, B., 2020. Interaction of certain monoterpenoid hydrocarbons with the receptor binding domain of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin B, and cathepsin L (CatB/L) and their pharmacokinetic properties. Turkish Journal of Biology, 44, 242-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-2005-46
8. Kelly, C., Jones, O., Barnhart, C., Lajoie, C., 2008. Effect of furfural, vanillin and syringaldehyde on Candida guilliermondii growth and xylitol biosynthesis. Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Springer, pp. 615-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-526-2_57
9. Koski, A., Pekkarinen, S., Hopia, A., Wähälä, K., Heinonen, M., 2003. Processing of rapeseed oil: effects on sinapic acid derivative content and oxidative stability. European Food Research and Technology, 217, 110-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-003-0721-4
10. Kuwahara, H., Kanazawa, A., Wakamatu, D., Morimura, S., Kida, K., Akaike, T., Maeda, H., 2004. Antioxidative and antimutagenic activities of 4-vinyl-2, 6-dimethoxyphenol (canolol) isolated from canola oil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 4380-4387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf040045+
11. Liu, J.Y., Du, C.L., Beaman, H.T., Monroe, M.B.B., 2020. Characterization of Phenolic Acid Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Structure-Property Relationships. Pharmaceutics, 12, 419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12050419
12. Maddox, C.E., Laur, L.M., Tian, L., 2010. Antibacterial activity of phenolic compounds against the phytopathogen Xylella fastidiosa. Current Microbiology, 60, 53-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9501-0
13. Merkl, R., Hradkova, I., Filip, V., ŠMIdRkal, J., 2010. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of phenolic acids alkyl esters. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 28, 275-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/132/2010-CJFS
14. Molan, P., Betts, J., 2004. Clinical usage of honey as a wound dressing: an update. Journal of Wound Care, 13, 353-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2004.13.9.26708
15. Monroe, M.B.B., Easley, A.D., Grant, K., Fletcher, G.K., Boyer, C., Maitland, D.J., 2018. Multifunctional shape‐memory polymer foams with bio‐inspired antimicrobials. ChemPhysChem, 19, 1999-2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201701015
16. Moreno, D.A., Pérez-Balibrea, S., Ferreres, F., Gil-Izquierdo, Á., García-Viguera, C., 2010. Acylated anthocyanins in broccoli sprouts. Food Chemistry, 123, 358-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.044
17. Nascimento, G.G., Locatelli, J., Freitas, P.C., Silva, G.L., 2000. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 31, 247-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822000000400003
18. Nowak, H., Kujawa, K., Zadernowski, R., Roczniak, B., KozŁowska, H., 1992. Antioxidative and bactericidal properties of phenolic compounds in rapeseeds. Lipid/Fett, 94, 149-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.19920940406
19. Sarikurkcu, C., Zengin, G., 2020. Polyphenol profile and biological activity comparisons of different parts of Astragalus macrocephalus subsp. finitimus from Turkey. Biology, 9, 231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9080231
20. Sawa, T., Nakao, M., Akaike, T., Ono, K., Maeda, H., 1999. Alkylperoxyl radical-scavenging activity of various flavonoids and other phenolic compounds: implications for the anti-tumor-promoter effect of vegetables. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 397-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980765e
21. Sharma, S., 1996. Applied multivariate techniques. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 512 p.
22. Sokmen, A., Jones, B.M., Erturk, M., 1999. The in vitro antibacterial activity of Turkish medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 67, 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00189-5
23. Ventola, C.L., 2015. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: Causes and threats. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 40, 277-283.
24. Wahdan, H., 1998. Causes of the antimicrobial activity of honey. Infection, 26, 26-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768748

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Aslihan Gurbuzer